Intel Xeon X5690 vs E5-2697 v2: A Comprehensive Comparison
In the ever-evolving world of processors, the Intel Xeon X5690 and the Xeon E5-2697 v2 stand out as notable contenders for high-performance computing solutions. Both processors are designed for demanding workloads, but they cater to slightly different needs and markets. This guide will provide an in-depth comparison of these two processors, focusing on their specifications, performance, value for money, and ideal use cases.
Comparison Table: Intel Xeon X5690 vs E5-2697 v2
| Feature | Intel Xeon X5690 | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Westmere EP | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Release Date | Q4 2010 | Q3 2014 |
| Cores | 6 | 12 |
| Threads | 12 | 24 |
| Base Clock | 3.46 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost | 3.73 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Cache Size | 12 MB | 30 MB |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 130 W | 115 W |
| Price Range | Approximately $350 | Approximately $1,000 |
| Performance (PassMark) | ~10,000 | ~21,000 |
| Value for Money | 101% better | 77% better |
Architecture and Design
Intel Xeon X5690
The Xeon X5690 is based on the Westmere architecture, which utilizes a 32nm manufacturing process. This architecture was designed to enhance performance and efficiency, particularly in data centers and enterprise environments. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it can handle multiple tasks simultaneously, making it suitable for workloads that require moderate parallel processing.
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
In contrast, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 is built on the more advanced Ivy Bridge architecture, featuring a 22nm process. This allows for better power efficiency and increased performance, especially in multi-threaded applications. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it excels in environments that demand high computational power, such as virtualization and heavy data processing tasks.
Performance Analysis
Benchmark Performance
Based on aggregate benchmark results from various sources, including www.cpubenchmark.net and technical.city, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms the Xeon X5690 by a significant margin—approximately 103%. This performance difference is attributed to its higher core and thread count, which allows it to manage more simultaneous processes.
Real-World Performance
User experiences also align with benchmark results. Many users report that the E5-2697 v2 handles demanding applications like video rendering and complex simulations more efficiently than the X5690. Conversely, for less intensive tasks, the X5690 remains a viable option, especially for budget-conscious consumers looking for decent performance at a lower price point.
Value for Money
Pricing Overview
The Xeon X5690 is often found in the range of $350, while the E5-2697 v2 typically costs around $1,000. Despite the higher price, the E5-2697 v2 offers more cores, threads, and better performance metrics, which can justify the investment for certain users.
Performance Per Price
When evaluating performance per dollar, the Xeon X5690 has a better value for money rating at 101% compared to the E5-2697 v2’s 77%. This means that if the workload does not fully utilize the capabilities of the E5-2697 v2, the X5690 could be the smarter choice for cost-conscious buyers.
Ideal Use Cases
Intel Xeon X5690
- Small to Medium Business Servers: Ideal for file storage, basic web hosting, and light virtualization.
- Gaming Systems: Suitable for gaming setups that don’t require excessive multitasking.
- General Office Applications: Provides adequate performance for standard office tasks and applications.
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Data Centers: Perfect for high-performance computing environments requiring robust processing power.
- Virtualization: Excels in scenarios where multiple virtual machines are hosted on a single physical server.
- Scientific Calculations: Beneficial for applications involving heavy data analysis and simulations.
Technical Features Comparison
| Feature | Intel Xeon X5690 | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Westmere EP | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Release Date | Q4 2010 | Q3 2014 |
| Cores | 6 | 12 |
| Threads | 12 | 24 |
| Base Clock | 3.46 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost | 3.73 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Cache Size | 12 MB | 30 MB |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 130 W | 115 W |
| Price Range | Approximately $350 | Approximately $1,000 |
| Performance (PassMark) | ~10,000 | ~21,000 |
Related Video
Conclusion
In summary, the Intel Xeon X5690 and Xeon E5-2697 v2 cater to different segments of the market. The X5690 offers solid performance for budget-conscious users with moderate workloads, while the E5-2697 v2 is designed for high-performance computing, handling demanding applications with ease. Depending on your specific needs, either processor could be the right choice, but for those looking for superior performance, the E5-2697 v2 is a clear winner.
FAQ
What is the main architectural difference between the X5690 and E5-2697 v2?
The X5690 is based on the Westmere architecture with a 32nm manufacturing process, while the E5-2697 v2 utilizes the more advanced Ivy Bridge architecture with a 22nm process, allowing for better performance and efficiency.
How many cores and threads do the X5690 and E5-2697 v2 have?
The X5690 has 6 cores and 12 threads, whereas the E5-2697 v2 has 12 cores and 24 threads, allowing it to handle more simultaneous processes effectively.
Which processor is better for gaming?
The Xeon X5690 can be a good choice for gaming systems that do not require extensive multitasking, while the E5-2697 v2 is better suited for high-performance gaming setups that may also run other applications simultaneously.
What is the price range for each processor?
The Intel Xeon X5690 typically costs around $350, while the E5-2697 v2 is priced around $1,000.
Which processor provides better value for money?
The Xeon X5690 offers a better value for money rating at 101%, compared to the E5-2697 v2’s 77%, making it more appealing for users with less demanding requirements.
Can the E5-2697 v2 handle virtualization?
Yes, the E5-2697 v2 is highly suitable for virtualization due to its higher core and thread count, which allows it to run multiple virtual machines efficiently.
What is the TDP of both processors?
The TDP of the Xeon X5690 is 130 W, while the E5-2697 v2 has a lower TDP of 115 W, indicating better power efficiency.
What type of workloads are best suited for the X5690?
The X5690 is ideal for small to medium business servers, general office applications, and light multitasking scenarios.
When was each processor released?
The Xeon X5690 was released in Q4 2010, while the E5-2697 v2 was released in Q3 2014.
What is the performance difference in benchmarks?
The E5-2697 v2 outperforms the X5690 by approximately 103% based on aggregate benchmarks, making it a more powerful option for intensive tasks.